Kevin Peters

Find an error

Name:
Organization: University of Colorado
Department: Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry
Title:
Co-reporter:Kevin S. Peters
Journal of Physical Organic Chemistry 2014 Volume 27( Issue 11) pp:909-916
Publication Date(Web):
DOI:10.1002/poc.3354

For the past 60 years, the standard model for the interpretation of the mechanism for proton transfer has been based upon transition-state theory, which posits that the transition state is found in the proton transfer coordinate involving the breaking and making of bonds. However, the observed dynamics of proton transfer within the triplet contact radical ion pair, derived from a variety of substituted benzophenones complexed with N,N-dimethylaniline, cannot be accounted for within the standard model for proton transfer. Instead, the kinetic behavior is in accord with nonadiabatic proton transfer theory that has the transition state in the solvent coordinate. Evidence for the importance of the solvent coordinate comes from the existence of an inverted region; as the driving force for reaction increases, the rate of proton transfer decreases. This kinetic behavior is not found in the standard model. The present paper employs density function theory to examine the question as to whether the inverted region can be attributed to the transition state being in the solvent coordinate or whether the inverted region is an artifact produced by changes in the structure of the triplet contact radical ion pair with the placement of substituents upon the p,p′ positions of benzophenone. It is concluded that the inverted region is not an artifact of substituent effects upon structure. These results support the conclusion that the transition state for proton transfer resides in the solvent coordinate and challenges the validity of the standard model for interpreting the mechanism of proton transfer. Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Co-reporter:Kevin S. Peters
Accounts of Chemical Research 2009 Volume 42(Issue 1) pp:89
Publication Date(Web):September 10, 2008
DOI:10.1021/ar8001156
For the past 60 years, the framework for understanding the kinetic behavior of proton transfer has been transition state theory. Found throughout textbooks, this theory, along with the Bell tunneling correction, serves as the standard model for the analysis of proton/hydrogen atom/hydride transfer. In comparison, a different theoretical model has recently emerged, one which proposes that the transition state occurs within the solvent coordinate, not the proton transfer coordinate, and proton transfer proceeds either adiabatically or nonadiabatically toward product formation. This Account discusses the central tenets of the new theoretical model of proton transfer, contrasts these with the standard transition state model, and presents a discrepancy that has arisen between our experimental studies on a nonadiabatic system and the current understanding of proton transfer. Transition state theory posits that in the proton transfer coordinate, the proton must surmount an electronic barrier prior to the formation of the product. This process is thermally activated, and the energy of activation is associated with the degree of bond making and bond breaking in the transition state. In the new model, the reaction path involves the initial fluctuation of the solvent, serving to bring the reactant state and the product state into resonance, at which time the proton is transferred either adiabatically or nonadiabatically to form the product. If this theory is correct, then all of the deductions derived from the standard model regarding the nature of the proton transfer process are called into question. For weakly hydrogen-bonded complexes, two sets of experiments are presented supporting the proposal that proton transfer occurs as a nonadiabatic process. In these studies, the correlation of rate constants to driving force reveals both a normal region and an inverted region for proton transfer. Yet, the experimentally observed kinetic behavior does not align with the recent theoretical formulation for nonadiabatic proton transfer, underscoring the gap in the collective understanding of proton transfer phenomena.
Co-reporter:Ganghyeok Kim;Kevin S. Peters
Journal of Physical Organic Chemistry 2005 Volume 18(Issue 1) pp:1-8
Publication Date(Web):31 AUG 2004
DOI:10.1002/poc.849

The dynamics of proton transfer within a variety of substituted benzophenones–N-methylacridan contact radical ion pairs in benzene were examined. The correlation of the rate constants for proton transfer with the thermodynamic driving force reveals both normal and inverted regions for proton transfer in benzene. Employing the isotopically labeled compounds N-methyl-d3-acridan and N-methylacridan-9,9-d2, the kinetic deuterium isotope effects were examined. The isotope dependence for the transfer process was examined within the context of the Lee–Hynes model for non-adiabatic proton transfer. The theoretical analysis of the experimental data suggests that the reaction path for proton–deuteron transfer involves tunneling. Conventional transition-state theory with the inclusion of the Bell correction for tunneling in the region of the transition state cannot account for the observed kinetic behavior. Copyright © 2004 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Methyl, (methylphenylamino)-
Methyl, hydroxydiphenyl-